計(jì)數(shù)器底座注塑件注塑模具設(shè)計(jì)【計(jì)算器外殼】【一模兩腔】

計(jì)數(shù)器底座注塑件注塑模具設(shè)計(jì)【計(jì)算器外殼】【一模兩腔】,計(jì)算器外殼,一模兩腔,計(jì)數(shù)器,底座,注塑,模具設(shè)計(jì),計(jì)算器,外殼 Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009 Vol IWCE 2009, July 1 - 3, 2009, London, U.K.New Cooling Channel Design for I njection Moulding A B M Saifullah, S.H. Masood and Igor SbarskiAbstract Injection moulding is one of the most versatile and important operation for mass production of plastic parts. In this process, cooling system design is very important as it largely determines the cycle time. A good cooling system design can reduce cycle time and achieve dimensional stability of the part.This paper describes a new square sectioned conformal cooling channel system for injection moulding dies. Both simulation and experimental verification have been done with these new cooling channels system. Comparative analysis has been done for an industrial part, a plastic bowel, with conventional cooling channels using the Moldflow simulation software.Experimental verification has been done for a test plastic part with mini injection moulding machine. Comparative results are present ed based on temperature distribution on mould surface and cooling time or freezing time of the plast ic part. The results provide a uniform temperature distribution with reduced freezing time and hence reduction in cycle time for the plastic part. Index TermsConformal cooling channel, Cycle time Moldflow, Square shape. I. INTRODUCTION Injection moulding is a widely used manufacturing process in the production of plastic parts 1. The basic principle of injection moulding is that a solid polymer is molten and injected into a cavity inside a mould which is then cooled and the part is ejected fro m the machine. Therefore the main phases in an injection moulding process involve filling, cooling and ejection. The cost-effectiveness of the process is mainly dependent on the time spent on the moulding cycle in which the cooling phase is the most significant step. Time spent on cooling cycle determines the rate at which parts are produced. Since, in most modern industries, time and costs are strongly linked, the longer is the time to produce parts the more are the costs. A reduction in the time spent on coo ling the part would drastically increase the productio n rate as well as reduce costs. So it is important to understand and optimize the heat transfer process within a typical moulding process. The rate of the heat exchange between the injected plastic and the mo uld is a decisive factor in the economical performance of an injection mould A B M Saifullah is a research doctoral student at Industrial Research Institute Swinburne (IRIS), Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia (e-mail- msaifullahswin.edu.au), also Member, IAENG. S. H. Masood is a Professor of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering at Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia. (Corresponding author, ph:+61-3-9214 8260, fax: +61-3-9214 5050, e-mail: smasoodswin.edu.au) Dr Igor Sbarski is a Senior Lecturer at Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.(e-mail: isbarskiswin.edu.au ). 3.Heat has to be taken away from the plastic material until a stable state has been reached, which permits demolding. The time needed to accomplish this is called cooling time or freezing time of the part. Proper design of cooling system is necessary for optimum heat transfer process between the melted plastic material and the mould. Traditionally, this has been achieved by creating several straight holes inside the mould core and cavity and then forcing a cooling fluid (i.e. water) to circulate and conduct the excess heat away from the molten plastic. The method s used for producing these holes rely on the conventional machining process such as straight drilling, which is incapable of producing complicated contour-like channels or anything vaguely in 3D space. An alternative method of coo ling system that co nforms or fits to the shape of the cavity and core of the mould can provide better heat transfer in injection moulding process, and hence can result in optimum cycle time. This alternative method uses contour-like channels of different cross-section, constructed as close as po ssible to the surface of the mould to increase the heat absorption away from the molten plastic. This ensures that the part is cooled uniformly as well as more efficiently. Now-a-days, with the advent of rapid p rototyping technology such as Direct Metal Deposition (DMD), Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and many advanced computer aid ed engineering (CAE) software, more efficient co oling channels can be designed and manufactured in the mould with many complex layout and cross-sections2,3,4. This paper presents a square section conformal co oling channel (SSCCC) for injection moulding die. Simulation has been done for an industrial p lastic part, a circular plastic bowel for these SSCCC and compared with conventional straight cooling channels (CSCC) with Moldflow Plastic Inside (MPI) software. Comparative experimental verification has also been performed with SSCCC and CSCC die for a circular shape test part with mini injectio n moulding machine for two plastic materials. Result shows that SSCCC die gives better cooling time and temperature distribution than that of CSCC dies. II. DESIGN OF THE PART AND MOULDS A. Part design The part circular plastic bowl made of polyprop ylene (PP) thermoplastic, as shown in Fig 1(a) has been designed with Pro -Engineer CAD software. It was then exported to IGES (Initial Graphics Exchange Specification) file surface model to impo rt in MPI for analysis. Material volume of the plastic part is 177.90cm and its weight is 162.3 gm. Experimental test part as shown in Fig 1(b) has also been d esigned with Pro-Engineer software. Experimental ISBN: 978-988-17012-5-1WCE 2009Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009 Vol IWCE 2009, July 1 - 3, 2009, London, U.K.verification has b een done with two types of plastic materials, PP and ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene). Test part volume was 8.8 cm3, and part weight for ABS and PP were 8.68 gm and 8.13gm respectively. (a)(b)(a) (b) Fig-1 CAD model of (a) Circular plastic bowel, (b) Test part. B. Mould Design Mould design has been done using Pro/Moldesign module of the Pro /Engineer system. This mould is then manufactured with Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine. The mould shown in Fig 2 has two parts, the core and the cavity.Square section conformal cooling channel (SSCCC) has been produced around the cavity by CNC machining of one half of the channel on cavity part and the other half on the core part.Both halves are then joined with screws and sealed with liquid gasket (Permatex) to avoid water leakage.Fig-2 Assembly CAD model of mould with core (top )and two cavity parts. III. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS MPI simulation software has been used for part analysis 5. Analysis sequence was flow-cool-warp. Polyprop ylene plastic material has been used for analysis. Comparative analysis has been done with conventional straight coo ling channel (CSCC) and SSCCC. The diameter of CSCC was 12 mm and the length of SSCCC section size was 12 mm (Fig 3).Fusion meshing with global edge length of 0.995 cm has been used . The numbers of mesh elements used were 12944 and 12291 for CSCC and SSCCC respectively. 3Fig-3 Analysis setting in MPI (a) CSCC (b) SSCCC Both cases used cooling medium as normal water of 25C. Reynolds number was 10000, melting temperature was 230 C. Comparative analysis result from MPI as shown in Fig 4 shows that SSCCC shows better temperature distribution and(a) (b) Fig-4 Comparative freezing or cooling time (a) CSCC(b) SSCCC. less part freezing time than CSCC. In case of CSCC, most of the part cools in about 24 second except the top few areas, while on the other hand SSCCC diagram shows that it is less than 20 seconds. And also CSCC shows the time to freeze range to be 0.4 6-93.7sec and SSCCC shows this to be 0.3-87.15sec. So, using SSCCC, 5 second of cooling time has been reduced which is 3 5% reduction of cooling time. IV. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION AND RESULTS Experimental verification has been done with a circular shap e plastic test part using the machined mould as shown in Fig 5. Part diameter was 40 mm and thickness was 7 mm.The mould dimension was 10x10x2.5 cm . Mould material was mild steel. Experiment has been done with a mini(a) (b) Fig-5 (a) Mild steel Core (left) and cavity with SSCCC (b) CSCC of mild steel. ISBN: 978-988-17012-5-1WCE 2009Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009 Vol IWCE 2009, July 1 - 3, 2009, London, U.K.injection moulding machine of TECHSOFT mini moulder (Fig 6). Two thermocouples TC08 K type of PICO technology have been used to measure temperature of top and bottom surface of the test part. Melting temperature was 250C fo r both ABS and PP. Normal water has been used as a cooling medium, room temperature has been measured as 25 C, so is cooling water. Cooling channel diameter was 5 mm for CSCC and SSCCC section size was 5 mm. With two thermocouples, surface temperature of the test part has been measured for every second.Fig-8 Comparative temperature plot for PPIn experimental tests, twenty samp le test parts have been produced for ABS and PP material for experimental verification and in every case almost the same data has been found. Fig 9 shows the sample test parts in ABS and PP,which have been produced fo r experimental verification. Fig-6 Experimental setup for test injection moulding, left: mini moulder, right: temperature outp ut in PC. Fig 7 and Fig 8 show the comparative temperature distribution for top and bottom surface of the plastic parts for 30 second. Fig-9 Sample test part prod uced for experimental verification Left: ABS right: PP plastic. V. CONCLUSION The cooling process is one o f the most important sub processes in injection moulding because it normally accounts for approximately half of the total cycle time and affects directly the Fig-7 Comparative temperature plot for ABSFrom Fig 7 it is noted that for the ABS plastic, using SSCCC, the top face and bottom face of test part cooled earlier than that with CSCC. In case of SSCCC, maximum top and bottom surface temperature recorded at particular time immediately after injection were 53.36 C and 52.1C. After30 second, this temperature reduced to 42.47 C and 43.07 C, whereas, for CSCC they were 53.24, 52.01 and 47.47, 47.72 C. So in average, 4 to 5 C reduction in temperature happens using the SSCCC. Similar results also have been found when using PP as the part material. From Fig 8, it can be shown that using SSCCC, about 2 to 3 C reduction in temperature can be possible. shrinkage, bending and warp age of the moulded plastic product.Therefore, designing a go od cooling channel system in the mould is crucial since it influences the production rate and quality. The results of MPI simulation and experimental verification show thatusing square shape conformal cooling channels gives up to 35% reduction in cooling time and 20% of the total cycle time can b e obtained, thus greatly improving the production rate and the production quality of injection moulded parts. ACKNOWLEDGMENT These authors are grateful to Mrs. Meredith and Phil Watson of Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Science,Swinburne University of Technology for their technicalsupport for die making with CNC machining.ISBN: 978-988-17012-5-1WCE 2009Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2009 Vol IWCE 2009, July 1 - 3, 2009, London, U.K.REFERENCES 1 D.V. Rosato, D.V. Rosato and M.G. Rosato, InjectionMoulding Handbook-3rd ed , Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2003). 2 X. Xu, E. Sach and S.Allen, The Design of ConformalCooling Channels In Injection Moulding Tooling,Polymer Engineering andScience, 4, 1, pp 1269-1272, (2001). 3 D.E. Dimla, M. Camilotto, and F. Miani: Design and optimization ofconformal cooling channels in injection moulding tools, J. of Mater.Processing Technology, 164-165, pp 1294-1300, (2005). 4 A B M Saifullah and S. H. Masood, Optimum cooling channels design and Thermal analysis of an Injection moulded plastic part mould, Materials ScienceForum, Vols. 561-565, pp. 1999-2002, (2007). 5 A B Saifullah, S. H. Masood and Igor Sbarski, cycle timeoptimization and part quality improvement using novel cooling channels in plastic injection moulding. ANTECNPE 2009, USA. ISBN: 978-988-17012-5-1WCE 2009